Rabbinical Judaism would have us believe you must speak modern Hebrew
to understand the Scriptures. Is this true? Is Modern Hebrew the
language of the Tanakh (OT) or even the writings of the Nazarenes (NT)?
The Jews, after the Babylonian exile, ended up adopting a Jewish
Babylonian Aramaic dialect and the Hebrew language died out. Ancient
Hebrew spoken by our forefathers in the Tanakh was succeeded by an
intermediary form, Mishnaic Hebrew and Aramaic about the 3rd century BC.
After 135 CE these intermediary languages became dead languages for
nearly 1,500 years before Modern Hebrew was developed in the 19th and
20th centuries. Modern Hebrew was a relatively new language with little
in common with the language of the Bible.
The Hebrew language spoken by our forefathers died out around 3 BC. The
intermediary language of Aramaic spoken in the time of Yahusha and
Ancient Hebrew are distinct from one another yet similar languages. They
can be compared as distant relatives, just like English and Dutch. All,
however, are dead languages today like Greek and Latin.
English is derived from Dutch and the two languages are the closest
yet speaking English does not add any value in translating Dutch to
English. If an expert in the English language heard another speaking
Dutch, it would be foreign and not understood. The same is true of
Biblical Hebrew and Modern Hebrew.
When the Romans destroyed the second Jewish Temple in 70 CE, the
language of Babylonian Aramaic spoken in the language cultural matrix of
the time Yahusha lived began to die out. It was essentially completely
dead 65 years later in 135, after the failure of the Bar Kokhba Revolt,
when Roman emperor Hadrian expelled, enslaved, or killed most of
Israel's remaining Jews — the final native Hebrew speakers.
So, must we speak modern Hebrew to understand what was written in a
language long since dead? Must we accept the modern-day Hebrew “language
and cultural matrix” to understand that written in a language and
cultural matrix that died out in 70 CE and ceased to exist after 135 CE?
No. Most of the Tanakh was written in Paleo Hebrew script that has been
dead for over 2,000 years. Palaeo-Hebrew, Proto-Hebrew or Old Hebrew, is
considered to be the script used to record the original texts of the
Hebrew Bible. By the 5th century BCE, the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet had been
mostly replaced by the Aramaic alphabet as officially used in the
Achaemenid Empire. The "Jewish square script" of today is a stylized
form of the Aramaic alphabet variant of today now known simply as the
Hebrew alphabet. This modern Hebrew script evolved directly out of the
Aramaic script by about the 3rd century BCE and was not standardized
until the 1st century CE.
No “Jewish Rabbi” today speaks ancient Hebrew (a dead language) and
speaking modern Hebrew does little to enlighten us. No longer under the
pagan influence of the Christian Church, many trying to find a solution
look to Judaism. Judaism is just as pagan as Christianity, both being
Hellenized Religions.
In Judaism—-Revelation of Moses Or Religion
of Men? By P Neal we read:
“Solomon Grayzel notes that Hellenism—as
compared to the effects of exile in Babylon—was “more persistent and
more subtle in its efforts to lure the Jews from their [Scripture-based]
way of life” (A History of the Jews, pp. 41-42). Martin brings out that
the Jews found it impossible to escape the omnipresence of Hellenistic
thought. Greek quickly became the language of commerce and social
intercourse, making it necessary to acquire fluency in Greek (p. 77). In
Story Without End, Solomon Landman writes that the Jews were “charmed by
the customs and manners, by the very spirit of the Greeks” (p. 73). But
as we will see, nowhere was this effect more pronounced than,
ironically, among the leaders of the Jews—the chief priests.”
As we will see, it was the corrupting influence of Hellenism on the
Aaronic priesthood that led to their loss of favor among the People of
the Land and the subsequent rise of the Hasidim, the progenitors of the
Pharisees. With the aid of their scribal cohorts, the outcome would
ultimately be today's Judaism.
We must overcome the Hellenistic Mindset of the current English
translations and the influence of BOTH Christianity and Judaism if we
are ever going to understand Scripture. Specifically, the Nazarene
writings called "The New Testament". The Greco-Roman mindset of
Hellenized Jewish translators gave preference to the Greek over the
Hebrew language, and played down the Hebrew terminology, to make
everything more acceptable to the pagan culture of the unwashed,
uneducated masses. They blended the Holy Scriptures with the worship of
the Greek Pantheon (called syncretism) and that is the context in which
modern-day religions of Christianity and Judaism were formed over time.
𝑯𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒐𝒏 – Wikipedia
𝐻𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑦
𝑜𝑓
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑠
𝑜𝑓𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑓𝑠
𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑓
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑝𝑒𝑜𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑤ℎ𝑜
𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑
𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑜𝑓
𝐴𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝐺𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑘
𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝐻𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑑
𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑅𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑛
𝐸𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑟𝑒 (𝑐.
300
𝐵𝐶𝐸
𝑡𝑜 300
𝐶𝐸).
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒
𝑤𝑎𝑠
𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦𝑖𝑛
𝐻𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛:
𝑡ℎ𝑒𝐺𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑘
𝑔𝑜𝑑𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑒𝑑𝑡𝑜
𝑏𝑒
𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑝𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑠
𝑤𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑠
𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒.
We call this assimilation of Greek Hellenism, to be Hellenized. We
know that the pagan Greek religions (Hellenism) overtook the Truth of
Yahuah, as Rome won the Roman/Jewish wars. "Jews" looked to assimilate
into Greek/Roman culture to avoid persecution and maintain their power
over the people. It is through this process of Hellenism, that we have
our modern English translations of Scripture from both Judaism and
Christianity:
𝑯𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 – Wikipedia
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑡ℎ
𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑦
𝑤𝑖𝑡𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑑𝑎
𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑦
𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑓
𝐻𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑛
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝐸𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑦𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑔
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝐴𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛𝐽𝑒𝑤𝑠
𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡
ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑙
𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦.
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝐽𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑓
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑠
𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑡
𝑡𝑜
ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒
𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑙𝑦
𝑡𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑠
𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠.
𝐵𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛
𝑡ℎ𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑑
𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡𝐶ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦𝑎𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑒
𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑦𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛
𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑠𝑒𝐻𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠
𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑
𝑏𝑒
𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡
𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑠
𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑𝑡𝑜
𝑎
𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑒
𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 (𝑃𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑛)
𝐽𝑒𝑤𝑖𝑠ℎ
𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑.
In the book Judaism— Revelation of Moses
Or Religion of Men? We read:
As a reliable historical source, the
extra-biblical book of II Maccabees informs us that under Jason's
influence, “the Hellenizing process reached such a pitch that the
priests ceased to show any interest in the services of the altar;
scorning the Temple and neglecting the sacrifices, they would hurry to
take part in [Greek activities] .... They disdained all that their
ancestors had esteemed and set the highest value on Hellenic honors” (II
Macc. 4:13-15; emphasis added).
The idea of a so-called “oral law” was
most contrived (created or arranged in a way that seems
artificial and unrealistic). In fact, with religious constraints cast
off, new ideas found fertile ground among these Jewish scholars.
Thus, while outwardly supporting the Scriptures and resisting
Hel-lenization, the scribes could justify virtually any doctrine by
claiming that it was part of an esoteric oral tradition—hidden all along
in the depths of the written Torah.
The Jews lost their way in diaspora. Judaism of today is a result of
the Jews assimilation. Gamaliel is the most influential Jewish Rabbi in
history and mentor of Sha’ul the Apostle. Gamaliel was such a respected
figure during the time of Yahusha, that he dictated the proceeding of
the Sanhedrin. His authority was such, that he even rivaled the
authority of the High Priest, as we read in Acts Chapter 5! The epigram
that Rabbinic literature gives to him speaks of the respect with which
Gamaliel was held:
Wℎ𝑒𝑛
ℎ𝑒
𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑑
𝑡ℎ𝑒
ℎ𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑟
[𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑤𝑎𝑟𝑑
𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡]
𝑜𝑓
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑎ℎ
𝑐𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑,
𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦
𝑎𝑛𝑑
𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑡𝑦
𝑏𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒
𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑡"(𝑆𝑜𝑡𝑎ℎ
𝑥𝑣:
18).
Even the Jews admit that upon Gamaliel’s death, the honor of the
Torah ceased (succumbed to Hellenism) and purity and piety became
extinct where it remains today, in the form of Rabbinical Judaism. From
that point forward, history records that Judaism succumbed to
Hellenization and paganism. So, the Jews recognize Gamaliel’s’ death as
the defining moment when Judaism went astray.
This is the hotbed in which Modern Judaism arose and what Yahusha the
Messiah pushed back against during his lifetime. The "Jews" tell us we
cannot know the Father unless we know “their” Hebrew. However, that is a
lie to maintain the influence and power of their priestly class of
Rabbis. Biblical Hebrew is a DEAD language. Ancient Paleo (the language
of the Torah) is deader still. Modern Hebrew is NOT Biblical Hebrew
(Paleo - Aramaic).
In the same way, the Church of Rome tells us we cannot know their God
(the Trinity) unless we know Latin, also a dead language. Again, like
Rabbinical Jews, to maintain the influence and power of their priestly
class.
Leaving us still with the burning question... "where is the Truth
and how can we come to know it"? It is found in His Divine
Counsel... The Heavenly Scroll!
Isaiah
48:11-15
11
For My Own Sake, for My Own Sake I will do it; for how could
dishonor come to My Name (Yahuah)?
I will not give My Glory (as
Creator)
to another (not
even Yahusha, Yahuah ALONE sits on the Throne of Creation - Isaiah
44:24)!
12 Listen to Me, Jacob and Israel, My Called; I am He; I
am the Aleph, I also am the Tav. 13 My Hand has laid the
Foundation of the Earth (by
Himself Isaiah 44:24),
and My Right Hand has spanned (spread
out like a tent)
The Heavenly Scroll; when I summon the Sun/stars/constellations
togethe they will minister the Gospel together as a Divine Counsel
to all mankind (Deut. 4:19).
14 All of you, gather yourselves together and hear (what
the Sun/stars/constellations Proclaim day after day, night after
night - Psalm 19, Enoch 35:3)!
Who among them has foretold these things in the heavens/stars?
There is what is called a language and cultural matrix that exists at
any time among a people. That Language and Cultural Matrix that existed
2,000 years ago does not exist today. It has long since died out
consumed by Hellenism. Judaism today is NOT that matrix. To truly
understand the Scriptures (from Genesis to Revelation as well as many
Apocryphal books) we must put ourselves into a matrix that was woven
together 2,000 years ago defined by a language that no longer exists and
culture long since gone.
Can that be done? Yes. And that is what we will do together. We will
go back and seek "the ancient path" they followed prior to 2,000 years
ago in Israel.
This is not a "Jew bashing session" but important that we understand
they are as opposed to their Messiah and their Scriptures manipulated
(as I will prove) just as Christianity is worshiping a false one based
on twisted Scripture.
Below are the arguments used to discredit the writings of the
Nazarenes called the New Testament:
-
No
original autographed copies
-
No
known authors and the New Testament was assembled over time hundreds
of years removed
-
Additions and alterations by the scribes
-
Miracles were parallels of other pagan gods
-
Contradictions
-
New
doctrines and truths – “Anything true in the NT isn't new and
anything new isn't true”
Next, I am going to apply this same standard to the Tanakh (Torah).
Is the Tanakh a work of Moses alone? Do we have autographed originals of
any of the books in the Tanakh? Are the authors accurate? Are the
miracles paralleled by other pagan myths? Have they been altered by
scribes? Are they compilations of various writings assembled over time
by a "redactor" or editor? It is said the forefathers never really
existed they are just legends and myths of oral traditions.
In
short, does the Tanakh fail the same tests used to discredit the New
Testament? If so, then where to we look for His Word, Righteousness, and
Truth?
Now, let us hold up the Tanakh to the same standards of scrutiny used
to discredit the NT. The NT is disregarded because there are no
"surviving autographs" of the books. Just copies found mainly in Greek
dating around 300 CE after the Council of Nicaea. You see, they were
burnt by Constantine to hide the abomination he had created now known as
Christianity. See my book Christianity and the Great Deception.
Buy Now!
But what about the Tanakh? Does it pass or fail
this test? We see by the time of Jeremiah (600 BC) the "word of Yahuah"
had been so altered by scribes it was unrecognizable and "lost".
𝑱𝙚𝒓𝙚𝒎𝙞𝒂𝙝
8:7-8
7 Bᴜᴛ
Mʏ
ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ
ᴅᴏ
ɴᴏᴛ
ᴋɴᴏᴡ
ᴛʜᴇ
ᴏʀᴅɪɴᴀɴᴄᴇ
ᴏꜰ
Yᴀʜᴜᴀʜ
(𝐸𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦
𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑
𝑖𝑛
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑠
-
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑚
119:89,
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑚
89:2). 8 Hᴏᴡ
ᴄᴀɴ
ʏᴏᴜ
sᴀʏ,
ᴡᴇ
ᴀʀᴇ
ᴡɪsᴇ
ᴍᴇɴ
(ℎ2450
𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑘𝑎𝑚
- '𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑠'),
Aɴᴅ
ᴛʜᴇ
Wᴏʀᴅ
ᴏꜰ
Yᴀʜᴜᴀʜ's
Tᴇsᴛɪᴍᴏɴʏ
(𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡
𝑌𝑎ℎ𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑎
𝑖𝑠
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐ℎ
𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑑
𝑖𝑛
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑙𝑦
𝑆𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙)
ɪs
ᴡɪᴛʜ
ᴜs?
Bᴜᴛ
ʙᴇʜᴏʟᴅ,
ᴛʜᴇ
‘ʟʏɪɴɢ
ᴘᴇɴ
ᴏꜰ
ᴛʜᴇ
sᴄʀɪʙᴇs’
ʜᴀs
ᴍᴀᴅᴇ
Mʏ
Wᴏʀᴅ
(𝐿𝑂𝐺𝑂𝑆/𝐷𝐴𝐵𝐴𝑅
- '𝑆𝑝𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑛
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒
𝑖𝑛
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑏𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔'
𝐸𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦
𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑
𝑖𝑛
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑙𝑦
𝑆𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙
-
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑚
119:89)
ɪɴᴛᴏ
ᴀ
ʟɪᴇ.
Again, in Jeremiah, we are told that our faith would be based on
“nothing but lies”. Not a “few lies”, not “a little lie here or there”,
not “mostly lies”, but TOTAL LIES… “Nothing but lies” there would be no
truth in the twisted Scriptures we have had handed down to us since at
least 600 BC.
𝑱𝙚𝒓𝙚𝒎𝙞𝒂𝙝 16:19
18 "I ᴡɪʟʟ
ꜰɪʀsᴛ
ᴅᴏᴜʙʟʏ ʀᴇᴘᴀʏ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ɪɴɪǫᴜɪᴛʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ sɪɴ, ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜsᴇ ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ
ᴘᴏʟʟᴜᴛᴇᴅ Mʏ ʟᴀɴᴅ; ᴛʜᴇʏ ʜᴀᴠᴇ
ꜰɪʟʟᴇᴅ
Mʏ ɪɴʜᴇʀɪᴛᴀɴᴄᴇ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴀʀᴄᴀssᴇs ᴏꜰ
ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴅᴇᴛᴇsᴛᴀʙʟᴇ ɪᴅᴏʟs ᴀɴᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇɪʀ ᴀʙᴏᴍɪɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴs." 19O Yᴀʜᴜᴀʜ, ᴍʏ
sᴛʀᴇɴɢᴛʜ ᴀɴᴅ ᴍʏ sᴛʀᴏɴɢʜᴏʟᴅ, Aɴᴅ ᴍʏ ʀᴇꜰᴜɢᴇ
ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴅᴀʏ ᴏꜰ
ᴅɪsᴛʀᴇss, Tᴏ Yᴏᴜ ᴛʜᴇ (𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑝 𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑒) ɴᴀᴛɪᴏɴs
ᴡɪʟʟ ᴄᴏᴍᴇ Fʀᴏᴍ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅs ᴏꜰ
ᴛʜᴇ ᴇᴀʀᴛʜ ᴀɴᴅ sᴀʏ, "𝙊𝒖𝙧𝙛𝒂𝙩𝒉𝙚𝒓𝙨
𝙝𝒂𝙫𝒆𝒊𝙣𝒉𝙚𝒓𝙞𝒕𝙚𝒅𝒏𝙤𝒕𝙝𝒊𝙣𝒈 𝒃𝙪𝒕𝑳𝙄𝑬𝙎,
𝑰𝙙𝒐𝙡𝒔𝒂𝙣𝒅 𝒘𝙤𝒓𝙩𝒉𝙡𝒆𝙨𝒔𝒕𝙝𝒊𝙣𝒈𝙨 𝙤𝒇
𝒏𝙤𝙥𝒓𝙤𝒇𝙞𝒕." 20 Cᴀɴ ᴍᴀɴ ᴍᴀᴋᴇ ɢᴏᴅs
ꜰᴏʀ
ʜɪᴍsᴇʟꜰ?
Yᴇᴛ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ɴᴏᴛ ɢᴏᴅs!
We don’t have any extensive manuscripts of anything from much before
150 BC. We have a number of messages written on tablets, sherds of clay
pot, walls and other durable objects. However, manuscripts created on
parchment or papyrus are much more fragile.
Abraham lived almost 2000 years before the first messages, which were
discarded scribal notes, are in the historical record of about 150 BC.
Abraham lived in 1800 BC. Moses lived 1500 years before that in 1200 BC.
The duration from the lost “originals” and when we first see any
manuscripts is thousands of years longer than that of the NT. The NT
“original” predates the first written manuscripts by a mere 70-300
years. So, there was a significant duration of time where the Tanakh was
manipulated by the scribes compared to the NT by more than 1,000 years.
The more popular a document was, the shorter its life would be. A
scroll of the Tanakh would have been used over and over, passed around,
and used again. One of the reasons for the survival of some ancient
Egyptian fragments is that they were transitory documents that no one
would necessarily have wanted to refer to later called Discarded Scribal
Notes.
What we
do have are not copies of originals of the Tanakh but scribal discards!
Discarded for a reason yet we use them as our source of the Tanakh.
Reading a scroll is destructive to it. Scrolls in intensive use, such as
the Torah, needed regular recopying, and we have extensive evidence that
this took place on a mass-production scale. This process destroyed any
written scrolls leaving only the small notes the scribes discarded. Not
used like the Torah scrolls, the scribal notes, meant to be thrown in
the trash, survived.
The
Bible consists of a bunch of stories written down by dozens (NT) and
hundreds of people (Tanakh) in different times of history, later
collected and redacted, again and again, changed or removed if they did
not conform to the doctrine of the time. Also, it was translated, and
translations were translated again and again to result in the Bibles you
usually can buy in a bookshop today. Manipulated by scribes working for
specific classes in Israel (Rabbis, Priests, King’s scribes, etc.) to
increase their power and authority over the people and the other
classes.
Those who have chosen to deny The Yahushaic Covenant point out the
authors of the books of the NT cannot be verified. Evidence points to
ghostwriters long after the first century (in most cases) and even
assembled from various sources over time. That sounds like a great point
as they fall back on The Tanakh and tell us how meticulously it was
maintained.
The truth is that "authorship" of a writing was not typically
provided prior to Hellenization. Simply not seen as important or even
proper. Names of those who wrote the Tanakh are not given, they were
"assigned" like the NT authors.
From Wikipedia: Authorship of the Bible:
“Authorship was not considered important by
the society that produced the Hebrew Bible, and the Torah never names an
author. It was only after c. 300 BCE, when Jews came into intense
contact with author-centric Greek culture, that the Hellenized rabbis
began to feel compelled to find authors for their books. They assigned
authors the same way the NT books were… “educated guess”. There is much
disagreement within biblical scholarship today over the authorship of
the Bible. The majority of scholars believe that most of the books of
the Bible are the work of multiple authors, assembled over time and that
all have been edited to produce the works known today.
Today, the majority of scholars agree
that the Torah does not have a single author and that its composition
took place over centuries. This is known as the Documentary Hypothesis,
which suggests that the first four books (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,
Numbers) were created by combining four originally independent
documents, written by what is known as the Jahwist, the Elohist, the
Deuteronomist, and the Priestly sources. Each adding texts to increase
the power and influence of their respective group.
The role of ensuring the scribes had a standard by which they all
used and guidelines of handling discarded or marginal notes and so forth
primarily fell upon the Priesthood. However, the Priesthood fell into
ruin and idol worship. So goes the Priests... so goes the scribes who
work for them!
From:
FAILURE OF THE PRIESTHOOD (victoriouslivingbiblestudy.com)
“The Levites, the descendants of Aaron, were designated by Yahuah to
perform the role of priests, as well as the care of the Tabernacle,
referred to as the House of God. The priesthood failed to do its job of
keeping the people's focus on Yahuah and worshipping Him. Thus the
people strayed into idol worshipping which made Yahuah angry with them
and having to deal with their rebellion. The failure was with the
priesthood as God told the prophets Isaiah and Ezekiel.”
𝙄𝙨𝙖𝙞𝙖𝙝
56:10-11
Hɪs ᴡᴀᴛᴄʜᴍᴀɴ (𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑠,
𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑠,
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑡𝑠,
𝑒𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑠)
ᴀʀᴇ ʙʟɪɴᴅ: ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴀʟʟ ɪɢɴᴏʀᴀɴᴛ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ᴀʟʟ ᴅᴜᴍʙ ᴅᴏɢs, ᴛʜᴇʏ
ᴄᴀɴɴᴏᴛ ʙᴀʀᴋ (𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑚
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡ℎ);
sʟᴇᴇᴘɪɴɢ, ʟʏɪɴɢ ᴅᴏᴡɴ, ᴅᴏᴡɴ, ʟᴏᴠɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ sʟᴜᴍʙᴇʀ. Yᴇᴀ, ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ ɢʀᴇᴇᴅʏ
ᴅᴏɢs ᴡʜɪᴄʜ ᴄᴀɴ ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ᴇɴᴏᴜɢʜ, ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇʏ ᴀʀᴇ sʜᴇᴘʜᴇʀᴅs ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴄᴀɴɴᴏᴛ
ᴜɴᴅᴇʀsᴛᴀɴᴅ:
𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚
𝒂𝒍𝒍
𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒌
𝒕𝒐
𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓
𝒐𝒘𝒏
𝒘𝒂𝒚,
𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚
𝒐𝒏𝒆
𝒇𝒐𝒓
𝒉𝒊𝒔
𝒐𝒘𝒏
𝒈𝒂𝒊𝒏,
𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎
𝒉𝒊𝒔
𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒓
“Yahuah's Word to Isaiah says the spiritual leadership was
self-indulgent and failed to look out for the spiritual well-being and
development of their people. We read in Ezekiel how the priesthood had
fallen into ruin.”
Ezekiel 22:26
Isʀᴀᴇʟ's
ᴘʀɪᴇsᴛs
ʜᴀᴠᴇ
ᴠɪᴏʟᴀᴛᴇᴅ
ᴍʏ
ʟᴀᴡ,
ᴀɴᴅ
ʜᴀᴠᴇ
ᴘʀᴏꜰᴀɴᴇᴅ
ᴍɪɴᴇ
ʜᴏʟʏ
ᴛʜɪɴɢs:
ᴛʜᴇʏ
ʜᴀᴠᴇ
ᴘᴜᴛ
ɴᴏ
ᴅɪꜰꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴄᴇ
ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ
ᴛʜᴇ
ʜᴏʟʏ
ᴀɴᴅ
ᴘʀᴏꜰᴀɴᴇ,
ɴᴇɪᴛʜᴇʀ
ʜᴀᴠᴇ
ᴛʜᴇʏ
sʜᴇᴡᴇᴅ
ᴅɪꜰꜰᴇʀᴇɴᴄᴇ
ʙᴇᴛᴡᴇᴇɴ
ᴛʜᴇ
ᴜɴᴄʟᴇᴀɴ
ᴀɴᴅ
ᴛʜᴇ
ᴄʟᴇᴀɴ,
ᴀɴᴅ
ʜᴀᴠᴇ
ʜɪᴅ
ᴛʜᴇɪʀ
ᴇʏᴇs
ꜰʀᴏᴍ
ᴍʏ sᴀʙʙᴀᴛʜs,
ᴀɴᴅ I
ᴀᴍ
ᴘʀᴏꜰᴀɴᴇᴅ
ᴀᴍᴏɴɢ
ᴛʜᴇᴍ.
Scholars today are concluding the Tanakh was not written by
individual authors, but rather by scribes inserting oral traditions that
cannot be backed up by any written source. The sources that form the
basis for the modern written Torah are small fragments of scrolls pieced
together by scribes over many centuries.
From Wikipedia: Documentary hypothesis
Wellhausen used the sources of the Torah as
evidence of changes in the history of the Israelite religion as it moved
from free, simple, and natural to fixed, formal, and institutional.
Modern scholars of Israel's religion have become much more circumspect
in how they use the Old Testament, not least because many have concluded
that the Hebrew Bible is not a reliable witness to the religion of
ancient Israel and Judah, representing instead the beliefs of small
segments of the ancient Israelite community centered in Jerusalem and
devoted to the exclusive worship of the god Yahweh (the Jahwist, the
Elohist, the Deuteronomist, and the Priestly sources). Source criticism
is the search for the original sources that form the basis of biblical
texts. In Old Testament studies, source criticism is generally focused
on identifying sources of a single text. For example, the
seventeenth-century French priest Richard Simon (1638–1712) was an early
proponent of the theory that Moses could not have been the single source
of the entire Pentateuch.”
According to Simon, parts of the Old Testament were not written by
individuals at all, but 'by scribes recording their communities oral
traditions shrowded in mystery having no written text or proof to back
the oral tradition:
The Newer Documentary Thesis inferred more
sources, with increasing information about their extent and
inter-relationship. The fragmentary theory was a later understanding of
Wellhausen produced by form criticism. This theory argues that
fragments of documents — rather than continuous, coherent documents —
are the sources for the Torah.
Several portions of the
Tanakh were passed down orally by a society in the process of becoming a
nation, who at times were nomads, and at times were living among
strangers in exile. Sacred texts were eventually recorded on
separate scrolls over many centuries by different authors with varying
agendas and styles to make their messages clear in their own
contemporary societies.
Rabbinical Judaim’s stranglehold on 'the Truth' cannot be justified.
They would have us believe the Torah has been meticulously copied by
THEIR scribes without error for thousands of years. However, the
opposite is true.
The NT comes under scrutiny because the miracles displayed by Yahusha
have parallels performed by pagan gods. I agree but under further
scrutiny these pagan legends do not predate the Messiah. Rather,
miracles perfromed by Yahusha were incorporated into the pagan beliefs
through syncretism as the Gospel spread into pagan lands.
But
what about the Tanakh? How does it stand up to the same scrutiny? While
there are many instances, let’s look at just 7 (you cannot make an
argument for 7 in the NT).
From
7 Bible Stories and Texts With Roots in Ancient Literature
(thecollector.com)
The question may also be asked whether
similarities, with turns and embellishments particular to each phase of
human culture and times, are not based on historical events that
affected their ancestors. Maybe there were events and wisdom in
deep-seated human memory and genetics, which happened before people
split into cultural groups after the tower of Babel.
Ref: 7 Bible Stories and Texts With Roots in Ancient Literature
(thecollector.com)
Story of Noah and the Flood is paralleled
by the pagan story of the Sumerian legend of Ziusudra (ca 2300 BC). In a
later version in Old Babylonian ca 1646 BCE, he is called Atrahasis.
Around the middle of the Old Babylonian Empire, he and the flood account
are weaved into the Epic of Gilgamesh as Utnapishtim (also
Pir-Napishtim). All these texts predate the Hebrew sacred texts, which
would later become the Hebrew Bible.
Below are a few more of
the “miracles” in the Tanakh which parallel pagan myths:
- Moses and Sargon of Akkad
- Job and the Mesopotamian Righteous Sufferer
- Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Egyptian Teachings
- Psalm 104 and Akhenaten’s Hymn to the Aten
- Song of Songs and Sumerian Literature
It becomes obvious that Rabbinical Judaism is based on "nothing
but lies" at the hand of the "lying pen of the scribes".
History and Scripture stands as a witness against them (Jeremiah 8).
𝑱𝙚𝒓𝙚𝒎𝙞𝒂𝙝 8:7-8
7 Bᴜᴛ Mʏ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ ᴅᴏ ɴᴏᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴡ ᴛʜᴇ ᴏʀᴅɪɴᴀɴᴄᴇ ᴏꜰ Yᴀʜᴜᴀʜ (𝐸𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦
𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑
𝑖𝑛
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑠 -
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑚 119:89,
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑚 89:2). 8 Hᴏᴡ ᴄᴀɴ
ʏᴏᴜ sᴀʏ, ᴡᴇ ᴀʀᴇ ᴡɪsᴇ ᴍᴇɴ (ℎ2450
𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑘𝑎𝑚 - '𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑠'), Aɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ Wᴏʀᴅ ᴏꜰ Yᴀʜᴜᴀʜ's Tᴇsᴛɪᴍᴏɴʏ (𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡
𝑌𝑎ℎ𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑎
𝑖𝑠
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐ℎ
𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑑
𝑖𝑛
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑙𝑦
𝑆𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙) ɪs ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴜs? Bᴜᴛ
ʙᴇʜᴏʟᴅ, ᴛʜᴇ ‘ʟʏɪɴɢ ᴘᴇɴ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ sᴄʀɪʙᴇs’ ʜᴀs
ᴍᴀᴅᴇ Mʏ Wᴏʀᴅ (𝐿𝑂𝐺𝑂𝑆/𝐷𝐴𝐵𝐴𝑅 - '𝑆𝑝𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑛
𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒
𝑖𝑛
𝑡ℎ𝑒
𝑏𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔'
𝐸𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦
𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑
𝑖𝑛
𝑇ℎ𝑒
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑙𝑦
𝑆𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙 -
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑚 119:89) ɪɴᴛᴏ ᴀ
ʟɪᴇ.
Next, I will look at the claim “Anything true in the NT isn't new and
anything new isn't true”! Does the Tanakh show a progression in
revelation over time, new laws, new covenants, and additions to the
previous covenants just like The Yahushaic Covenant?
I was told that “𝑨𝒏𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝑵𝑻 𝒊𝒔𝒏'𝒕
𝒏𝒆𝒘𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒚𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒘 𝒊𝒔𝒏'𝒕 𝒕𝒓𝒖𝒆”. But what of the
OT? If the statement above is true, then almost all of the Tanakh is
false because it is the story of a Spiritual Kingdom revealed
progressively through Earthly covenants.
Regardless of how much Rabbinical Judaism wants us all back under the
Mosaic Covenant as if that is the only covenant in the Tanakh, there are
many covenants in the Tanakh. Each one added new aspects and truths to
the previous one! Are we to reject all covenants after the Mosaic?
Judaism would say ‘Yes’, if that is the standard for rejecting The
Yahushaic Covenant because it has unique revelation (as do all
covenants).
Over time, through covenants, the Will of Yahuah to establish His
Kingdom with His King was further revealed through 7 covenants. The
first 6 were physical covenants which were shadows cast by The Heavenly
Scroll. The final 7th is the revelation of the Spiritual Kingdom.
Each progressive covenant enforces, strengthens, and adds to
the one before it a very specific aspect of His Kingdom through
physical to Spiritual parallels. Ultimately all previous 6 physical
covenants would be fulfilled in the 7th final covenant in the Spiritual
realm. All the shadows cast by The Heavenly Scroll revealing the
“complete plan” for the Spiritual Kingdom would be fulfilled “on Earth
as it is written in The Heavenly Scroll”.
Below are the 7 major covenants between The Creator and His “Chosen
Few”:
-
The Sabbath Covenant
-
The Edenic/Adamic Covenant
-
The Noahic Covenant
-
The Abrahamic Covenant
-
The Mosaic Covenant
-
The Davidic Covenant
-
The Yahushaic Covenant
Now let’s go further into each one closely and we will see each
covenant builds on the previous one with unique revelation. Further
revealing His Kingdom on Earth through the line of the House of King
David and the House of Zadok. Two lines of Kings and High Priests
restored and fulfilled in Yahusha the Melchi (Royal) Tsedek (Righteous
High Priest).
His Kingdom is not of this Earth. So, for us to understand a Kingdom
we cannot see or touch Yahuah uses this physical realm to teach us of
the Spiritual Realm. This is called physical to Spiritual parallels. The
Bible is the story, from our human experience, of Yahuah fulfilling His
Will on Earth as it was written in The Heavenly Scroll. The Tanakh and
the N.T. must be understood in the context of The Heavenly Scroll.
History and the future must be weighed against it!
Let’s take a
brief tour of the covenants in The Bible. Next, I summarize each
covenant to demonstrate how each one progressively revealed vital
aspects of the Kingdom of Yahuah (this is a simple overview not intended
to be an in-depth study of these covenants):
The Sabbath Covenant established Yahuah as The Creator. It is between
Yahuah and His Creation and the basic revelation in that covenant was:
-
The
Sabbath Covenant was defined as 6 days then a Sabbath Rest on the
7th Day specifically. This 7-day portrait is a Physical to spiritual
parallel that established the timeframe by which Yahuah would
introduce His Kingdom through covenants and progressive revelation.
The “days” are prophetic days where 1 day = 1 thousand years. So the
Sabbath Covenant establishes a 6,000-year timeframe by which Yahuah
would train His sons by putting them through a life on Earth. It is
during this life that Yahuah would purchase their salvation to serve
Him in His Kingdom. At the end of 6,000 years, Yahuah would
establish His Kingdom on Earth and further train His sons to rule
under the authority of Yahusha the Messiah. At the end of 7,000
years, His Kingdom would be complete, His sons trained to rule, and
the Kingdom of Yahuah would then expand to govern all of His
Creation for eternity… Yahuah blessed and sanctified the Sabbath
(7th Day) and made it Holy.
-
The
Sabbath would serve as a “sign” between Yahuah and His chosen sons
for eternity in all covenants and those who keep the Sabbath are set
apart from His Creation with Him. It is the Sabbath that is “the
Standard of the Kingdom of Yahuah”. Keeping the Sabbath weekly is
expressing faith and hope in the coming Kingdom of Yahuah.
Yahuah
reveals in these first covenants with man:
-
He has
given His sons the authority to rule creation.
-
Yahuah
discloses His intent to choose a human King/Messiah through the
“seed of a woman” who would crush all those opposed to Yahuah’s
Authority.
-
Yahuah
establishes the “system of training” used to train His chosen. A
system of “right” and “wrong” is defined as “obedience to Yahuah’s
commandments” known as the Law.
-
It is
the Law that is the foundation of and constitution of His Divine
Government.
-
The Law
in the Edenic/Adamic Covenants was active but unknown to man as it
was in the Mind of Yahuah. It was slowly being transposed from the
Mind of Yahuah to man orally.
Yahuah renewed the two previous covenants with Noah after destroying
the remnant seed of the Nephilim (Satan’s sons from the seed of women)
from the face of the earth. In this covenant:
-
Yahuah
made a promise not to destroy this planet again by flood. The
rainbow is the sign of this promise.
-
The
Noahic Covenant is a continuation of the previous two covenants and
all aspects of the Edenic/Adamic Covenants are still in effect
nothing changed, it just needed to be renewed as mankind started
over with Noah.
Yahuah reveals His chosen bloodline among the sons of men. In the
Abrahamic Covenant Yahuah reveals:
-
The
bloodline would run through Abraham/Isaac/Jacob and be called
“Israel”.
-
It is
from within this bloodline that Yahuah would introduce His chosen
family to His creation, train them through a life on Earth, and
prepare them for His coming Kingdom.
-
It is
through this bloodline that Yahuah would bring forth “Yahuah’s
Salvation” which is what the name Yahusha means in Hebrew.
-
Yahuah
also reveals the physical-to-spiritual parallel of the Promised Land
and His promises to His sons of inheritance.
-
The
Abrahamic Covenant contains all the terms and conditions of the
previous 3 covenants with the addition of the chosen bloodline and
promises to that bloodline.
-
The Law
of Yahuah was then fully transposed to Abraham orally and the Oral
Law was passed down from generation to generation.
The Mosaic Covenant builds on all the previous covenants as Yahuah:
-
Transposed His Law from oral to written down in stone as He reveals
the “Constitution of His Kingdom” in detail. The instructions to His
sons on how to be righteous before Him are known as the Law of
Yahuah.
-
Yahuah
firmly establishes in stone that His Kingdom is a kingdom of law.
-
Yahuah
establishes and defines various “cabinets/positions” within His
Kingdom such as High Priests, Priests, Judges, Kings, etc.
-
Yahuah
chose specific bloodlines within “Israel” to serve Him as Priests
(Levi) and High Priests (Aaron). These priesthoods served as
physical examples of what Yahusha would do spiritually as
Melchizedek.
-
Yahuah
reveals specific seasons i.e. Holy Days which were to serve as
training aids (Physical to spiritual parallels) to help His chosen
to know the Messiah when he came/comes again.
The Davidic Covenant builds on all previous covenants as Yahuah:
-
Established a physical righteous King to serve as an example of the
coming Spiritual King (Physical to spiritual parallels).
-
It was
established that the Throne of David would be the throne and
bloodline through which the Messiah and King would come to govern
His Kingdom for eternity.
-
Yahuah
established His Throne, Capital City, Temple, and Altar in detail
physically as physical to spiritual parallels.
The Yahushaic Covenant builds on all previous covenants and
“fulfills” them all by transposing them to their fullest spiritual
application. The Yahushaic Covenant is “new” in that the Law is now
written on our hearts. This is the final transposition of the Law which
went from the mind of Yahuah, to orally passed down, to written in stone
to written on our hearts.
The “intent” behind the “letters” supersedes the physical act. Up to
this point, Yahuah had fully defined His coming Kingdom through physical
to spiritual parallels so that we could understand the Yahushaic
Covenant.
All previous 6 physical covenants are TRANSPOSED to Spiritual Reality
in the Yahushaic Covenant:
-
Sabbath Covenant – Yahusha
fulfills the Sabbath Covenant when he returns to reign as King of
the 7th Millennium and gives us “rest”.
-
The Edenic Covenant – Yahusha
is given all authority over creation and trains the sons of Yahuah
to rule creation. the Kingdom of Yahuah is set up on a smaller scale
over the Earth during the 7th Millennium and “Eden” is restored.
-
The Adamic Covenant -
Established the system for training His sons to rule and foretold of
His coming Messiah/King that would crush all rebellion against Him –
Yahusha is that prophesied king who is born of a woman and crushes
the head of the enemy. As the firstborn of the resurrection and
first son to be TRANSPOSED to the Kingdom of Yahuah; Yahusha is
called “the Second Adam” and “forefather of everlasting life”.
-
The Abrahamic -
The bloodline would run through Abraham/Isaac/Jacob and be called
“Israel”. It is from within this bloodline that Yahuah would
introduce His chosen family to His creation, train them through a
life on Earth, and prepare them for His coming Kingdom. It is
through this bloodline that Yahuah would bring forth “Yahuah’s
Salvation” which is what the name Yahusha means in Hebrew. Yahuah
also reveals the physical-to-spiritual parallel of the Promised Land
and His promises to His sons of inheritance. The Abrahamic Covenant
contains all the terms and conditions of the previous 3 covenants
with the addition of the chosen bloodline and promises to that
bloodline. The Law of Yahuah was then fully transposed to Abraham
orally and the Oral Law was passed down from generation to
generation.
-
The Mosaic Covenant - Yahusha
TRANSPOSES the Law from written in stone or “the letter” to the
Spiritual intent of your heart. the Law is transposed from the Law
of Sin and Death to the Law of the Spirit of Life as Yahusha’s blood
covers the decrees in the Law that demand our death for
disobedience. The Priesthood is TRANSPOSED to the Spiritual Kingdom
under a new eternal High Priest… Melchizedek. The law that defines
the role of the priesthood is TRANSPOSED to the Spiritual Kingdom of
Yahuah to give Yahusha authority to make the proper sacrifices and
atonement as High Priest.
-
The Davidic Covenant - Yahusha
is the spiritually righteous King from the line of David and sits on
the Throne of David for eternity. Yahusha TRANSPOSES the Temple, the
Altar, and the Capital City to the Spiritual Kingdom of Yahuah.
Yahuah’s Temple is our body, His Altar is in our hearts, His Capital
City is made up of all of the sons of Yahuah; Yahusha is the
cornerstone. All the physical metaphors, examples, rehearsals, and
shadow pictures find their fullest expression Spiritually as Yahusha
“fulfills” them all and ushers them into the Kingdom of Yahuah.
-
The Yahushaic Covenant - The Yahushaic
Covenant builds on all previous covenants and “fulfills” them all by
transposing them to their fullest spiritual application. The
Yahushaic Covenant is “new” in that the Law is now written on our
hearts. This is the final transposition of the Law which went from
the mind of Yahuah, to orally passed down, to written in stone to
written on our hearts.
The “intent” behind the “letters” supersedes the physical act. Up to
this point, Yahuah had fully defined His coming Kingdom through
physical to spiritual parallels so that we could understand the
Yahushaic Covenant.
As we can see with each new covenant the previous covenants are still
valid. Each covenant adds to the Law, defining new elements of the
Kingdom of Yahuah, and progressively disclosing new physical shadows
that parallel Spiritual Truths.
Yes, there are new aspects to The Yahushaic
Covenant that further define and fulfill the previous 6 physical
covenants. Just as each of the previous further defined and added new
aspects to the ones before them. If we are to reject The Yahushaic
Covenant because of this, then all covenants must be rejected as well.
