|
Yahusha is called the firstborn of
Creation. Does
this mean that Yahusha was created and existed prior to his
human birth? To
understand this title for Yahusha we must use
Wisdom and
Insight and
overcome the pagan philosophy of “Logos” and the
physical to spiritual parallel of “light”.
It is imperative that we all know what
happened when Greeks and Romans took over the faith.
We know the Greeks did not understand scripture and
twisted it into a lie:
1 Corinthians 1
20 Where is
the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the
disputer of this age? Has not Yahuah made foolish the wisdom
of this world? 21
For since, in the wisdom of Yahuah, the world (the
Roman Empire) through wisdom did not know
Yahuah, it pleased Yahuah through the foolishness of the
message preached to save those who believe.
22 For Jews request a
sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom (through
philosophy);
23 but we preach the Passover sacrifice of Yahusha, to
the Jews a stumbling block and
to the Greeks
foolishness,
24 but to those who are called, both Jews and
Greeks, the Messiah is the power of Yahuah and the wisdom of
Yahuah. 25
Because the foolishness of Yahuah is wiser than men, and the
weakness of Yahuah (if there is
such a thing) is stronger than men.
2 Peter 3
14
Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things,
be diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and
blameless; 15
and consider that the longsuffering of our King is
salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the
wisdom given to him, has written to you,
16 as also in all his
letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some
things hard to understand,
which untaught
and unstable people twist to their own destruction,
as they do
also the rest of the Scriptures.
We say that the Hebrew texts and the
Gospel and all the Hebrew names were “Hellenized” not
realizing what that means.
That word does not just mean the Hebrew texts were
translated into Greek and Latin.
What Hellenized literally means is that the
polytheistic religion of the Greeks was merged into the
texts and the text altered to be “Greek appropriate” so the
pagans could be assimilated into the one world religion
called Christianity.
Hellenism is Greek paganism.
Everyone should fully understand what happened during
this time in history.
The Truth of Yahuah was merged with pagan Hellenism
through syncretism.
We see below that nothing changed with Hellenism and
that the same gods continued to be worshipped until 300 CE.
This is when
Constantine
brought everything under one pagan religion called
Christianity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenistic_religion
Hellenistic religion
Hellenistic religion is any of the various systems of
beliefs and practices of the people who lived under the
influence of ancient Greek culture during the Hellenistic
period and the Roman Empire
(c. 300 BCE to
300 CE).
There was much continuity in Hellenistic religion: the Greek
gods continued to be worshipped, and the same rites were
practiced as before.
We call this assimilation of Greek
Hellenism
to be Hellenized.
We know that the pagan Greek religion (Hellenism)
overtook the truth of Yahuah and the resulting religion is
now called Christianity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenization
Hellenization
The twentieth
century witnessed a lively debate over the extent of
Hellenization in the Levant
and particularly among the ancient Palestinian Jews
that has continued until today. The Judaism of the
diaspora was thought to have succumbed thoroughly to its
influences. Bultmann thus argued that
Christianity
arose almost completely within those Hellenistic confines
and should be read against that background as opposed to a
more traditional (Palestinian) Jewish background
The Catholic Church openly admits to
forging the Scripture! These scribes and priests felt
they had a "Divine Mandate" to alter the texts to support
their personal pagan beliefs.
The
Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume 6, page 136, gives us
this admission.
"Substitution of
false documents and tampering with genuine ones was quite a
trade in the Middle Ages. Innocent III (1198) points
out nine species of forgery [of ecclesiastical records]
which had come under his notice. But such
frauds of the Church
were not confined to the Middle Ages;
they begin even with
the beginning of the Church and infest every period
of its history for fifteen hundred years and
defile nearly every
document, both of "Scriptures" and of Church
aggrandizement. As truly said by Collins, in his celebrated
Discourse of Free Thinking:
"In Short,
these frauds are very common in all books which are
published by priests or priestly men... For it is
certain they may
plead the authority of the Fathers for Forgery, Corruption
and mangling of Authors, with more reason than for
any of their Articles of Faith.."(p.96.)
I want to firmly establish this
historical fact because “Logos” was one of those
philosophical ideas of Hellenism that was incorporated into
the texts and the texts were altered by the Greek and
Hellenized Jews who translated it.
In order to justify the false doctrine
of “pre-existence” or the “incarnation” that Yahusha
pre-existed with Yahuah and was co-creator, Christianity
quotes John Chapter 1:
John 1
1
In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 He was with God in
the beginning. 3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing
was made that has been made.
4 In him was life, and
that life was the light of all mankind.
5 The light shines in
the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome
it.
6
There was a man sent from God whose name was John.
7 He came as a witness
to testify concerning that light, so that through him all
might believe. 8
He himself was not the light; he came only as a
witness to the light.
9
The true light that gives light to everyone was coming
into the world. 10
He was in the world, and though the world was made
through him, the world did not recognize him.
11 He came to that
which was his own, but his own did not receive him.
12 Yet to all who did
receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the
right to become children of God—
13 children born not
of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s
will, but born of God.
14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us.
We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son,
who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
15
(John testified concerning him. He cried out, saying,
“This is the one I spoke about when I said, ‘He who comes
after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’”)
16 Out of his
fullness we have all received grace in place of grace
already given. 17
For The Law was given through Moses; grace and truth
came through Jesus Christ.
18 No one has ever
seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and
is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him
known.
All the modern translation like the NIV
above are uninspired Hellenized translations giving
preference to Greek mythology not the Hebrew mindset. Let us
define terms and then correct the modern Hellenized
translations with the intent and mindset of John who
was a Hebrew Jew not a Greek philosopher. First a
quick note on the use of "sound bites" to create doctrine.
"Sound Bites" vs. Sound Teaching
The doctrine of
“pre-existence”, “Logos”, and the “Incarnation” are very
good examples of taking scripture out of context.
Taking scriptural “sound bites” and stringing them
all together out of context to create an implied
doctrine. These
doctrines are always easy to identify because they violate
clear explicate doctrine (sound doctrine).
Anytime an implied doctrine is formulated that
contradicts explicit scriptures we must reject that
doctrine as our “understanding” is flawed.
Let's look closer at how the doctrine evolved that Yahusha
is literally the "Word" or “Divine Logos” of Yahuah that
became flesh used to justify incarnation. Is Yahusha
literally the "Word" or is Yahusha the fulfillment of
Yahuah's Word from the beginning. There is a big difference.
Logos a pagan philosophy
As you can see, the entire doctrine of incarnation that lead
to the acceptance of the pagan Babylonian Trinity through
syncretism did not come about until 4 centuries after
Yahusha lived and died.
That false doctrine that Yahusha is literally "Logos"
and not the fulfillment of Yahuah's predestined plan evolved
in the 4th Century through the "tradition
and reasoning" under the influence of pagan Greek
philosophers such as Plato...
The Abingdon Dictionary of Living Religions,
page 767, tells us:
TRINITY (Ch). The Dogma, formulated authoritatively in
fourth century church Councils, that Christians worship one
God in three persons (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) and one
substance. Under pressure to explain to a hostile Roman
world how Christians counted themselves monotheists,
Christian apologists (notably Justin Martyr, d. 165)
combined Johannine and Stoic-Platonic understanding of the
term Logos ("Reason," or "Word") in order to
maintain that the Son was both God's own self-expression and
a being distinct from him.
So we read above The Trinity was justified not through the
Word of Yahuah (because it cannot be) it was justified using
Hellenism or the “combined Johannine and Stoic Platonic”
pagan philosophy of the term “Logos”.
We
read below that the term
logos was
defined by Christians according to the interpretations of
pagan influenced philosophers in order to promote a
false pagan God-savior:
Encyclopedia Britannica,
Volume 7, page 449:
LOGOS
(Greek:"word,
"reason, or plan"), plural logoi, in Greek philosophy
and theology, the divine reason implicit in the
cosmos, ordering it and giving it form and meaning.
Though the concept defined by the term logos is found in
Greek, Indian, Egyptian, and Persian philosophical and
theological systems, it became particularly
significant in Christian writings and doctrines to describe
or define the role of Jesus Christ as the principle of God
active in the creation and the continuation structuring of
the cosmos and in revealing the divine plan of salvation to
man. It thus underlies the basic Christian doctrine of
the pre-existence of Jesus…
The identification of Jesus with
the logos was further developed in the early church but more
on the basis of Greek philosophical ideas than on Old
Testament motifs.
The concept of
Logos was based on
Greek philosophical
ideas not on any prophecy or Old Testament “motifs”
or Hebrew understanding at all.
It is and remains a pagan philosophy of Hellenism.
The Religions of Ancient Greece and Babylonia
clearly tells us that the Greek philosophical ideas were
developed in
Alexandria, Egypt from the pagan Babylonian
mystery religions. These ideas pertaining to the meaning
of Logos
penetrated as a result of modern religious thought through
the philosophy of Greece
and Egypt.
It was through syncretism that we have the word “Logos”
or “Word” written in our English Bibles instead of “The
Plan of Yahuah”:
The Religions of Ancient
Greece
and Babylonia,
by A. H. Sayce. pages 229-230
Many of the theories of Egyptian religion, modified and
transformed no doubt, have penetrated into the theology of
Christian Europe, and form, as it were, part of the woof in
the web of modern religious thought.
Christian theology was largely
organized and nurtured in the schools of Alexandria, and
Alexandria was not only the meeting place of East and West,
it was also the place where the decrepit theology of Egypt
was revivified by contact with the speculative philosophy of
Greece. Perhaps,
however, the indebtedness of Christian theological theory
to ancient Egyptian dogma is nowhere more striking than in
the doctrine of the Trinity. The very terms used of it
by Christian theologians meet us again in the inscriptions
and papyri of Egypt.
Originally the trinity was a triad
like those we find in Babylonian mythology.
The triad consisted of a divine father, wife, and son. The
father became the son and the son the father through all
time, and of both alike the mother was but another form.
It
is from the pagan mystery religions that the Greek
philosophers developed the idea of
Logos:
The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology,
Volume 3, page 1085
Among the systems offering an explanation of the world in
terms of the logos, there are the Mystery
Religions. These cultic communities did not see their
task as lying in the communication of knowledge of a
scientific nature, but of mysteries to their initiates who
strove for purification in the recurrent enactment of sacred
actions. The Foundation for these cultic actions was Sacred
Text. Among them were the cults of Dionysus, the
Pytha-goreans, and the Orphic Mysteries. By means of these
cults, non Greek thought, such as in the Isis-Osiris
Mysteries, which Osiris
the logos
created by Isis is the spiritual image of the world. Similarly in the
cult of Hermes, Hermes informed his son Tat in the Sacred
Text belonging to the cult, how by God's mercy, he became
logos, and thus a
son of God. As such, he (Hermes) brought regulation and
form into world, but himself remained a mediating being
between God and matter, on one side, and God and man on the
other.
The logos can
also, however, appear as the son of Hermes, resulting in a
triple (trinity) gradation: God (who is Zeus), Son (Hermes),
and LOGOS.
Now back to John Chapter 1 where this pagan philosophy of
“Logos” was mistranslated into our English Bibles by
uninspired Hellenized translators.
John 1
1
In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 He was with God in
the beginning. 3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing
was made that has been made.
4 In him was life, and
that life was the light of all mankind.
5 The light shines in
the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome
it.
The
word “word”
in these verses comes from the Greek word
logos. The
Christians, so eager to promote the pagan Trinity, attached
to the word every pagan interpretation.
But they deliberately ignore the fact that John was a Hebrew
Jew who had nothing to do with pagan Greek philosophy and
the Gospel of John was not written from the pagan mindset
associated with the Greek work
logos.
The Gospel of John was written from a Hebraic mindset
and most probably penned originally in Hebrew not Greek.
The Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia,
Moody Press,
Chicago,
IL, Volume 2 pages 1046-1047.
Many scholars have argued that the apostle John had this
philosophical development (of the pagan LOGOS) in the back
of his mind when he wrote the prologue to his Gospel and
that he actually tried to impart some of these (pagan)
concepts. For a long time many have contended that the
background of the fourth Gospel was essentially Hellenistic
rather than Hebraic. In dealing with such an assertion we
may note that studies in the Dead Sea scrolls have tended to confirm the traditional
conservative position that the cultural orientation of
the Gospel of John was Hebraic. Moreover, we must
observe that John was a simple fisherman from
Palestine. … there is no
evidence that he imbibed any Greek pagan philosophical
orientation in John Chapter 1. If he intended to be
philosophical in the first few verses, he certainly was not
anywhere else. We may argue that John used the word
"logos." in its ordinary meaning.
This
source admits that John used this word in its ordinary
meaning in the Hebraic mindset. They further admit that
John's writings were Hebraic not Greek which means the
actual word John used was the Hebrew word
dabar not the
Greek word
logos.
The Encyclopedia Judaica admits that the style
of most of the writings in The New Testament is, in fact,
Hebraic. The
Greek versions we have today of The New Testament are later
Hellenized versions translated from earlier Hebrew original
versions that were most likely burned after the council of
Nicea. So “logos”
is a mistranslation; the original version of John Chapter 1
used the Hebrew word
debar.
The Encyclopedia
Judaica, Volume 12, page 1060
THE LANGUAGE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT.
Although the language of the New Testament, in the form that
it exists today, is Greek, two earlier influences are still
discernible.
(1) THE INFLUENCE OF THE ARAMAIC-HEBREW ORIGINALS.
Because most of the authors were Jewish Nazarenes,
they spoke, for the most part, Aramaic, and some also
mishnaic Hebrew. This influence, which was
detectable particularly in the original versions of Mark and
Matthew, survives to some degree in their extant Greek
versions and in several of the Epistles as well, including
James and Jude.
(2) THE SEPTUAGINT.
Since this translation was used by
many authors, the New Testament contains not only Aramaic
words and phrases, which the disciples heard from Jesus and
took care to remember out of reverence for their master
(e.g. Talitha Kumi (Mark 5:41), Kum, Rabboni, Eli, Eli
(Elohi, Elohi) lama sabachthani (Matt. 27:46; Mark 15:24)),
but also expressions and phrases which retain their Hebrew
flavor although they were transmitted through the
Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible.
So, John wrote under inspiration of Yahuah, not of a
pre-existent God-savior, but of the wonderful
Plan of Yahuah
which is what the Hebrew word
debar
implies. The Anchor Bible shows us from the
Talmud that seven things were in Yahuah's mind showing us
what the Hebraic mindset was.
His Plan was from the beginning and this plan
included the Savior.
This is the mindset of John Chapter 1 not the pagan
philosophy of “Logos”:
The Anchor Bible,
Ephesians 1-3,
page 111
IN THE TALMUD
tractate
Pesachim 54a; cf. Nedarim 39b, seven things, i.e. the
law, repentance, paradise, Gehinnom, the throne of glory,
the heavenly sanctuary, and the messiah are not
called pre-created, but pre-conceived in (Yahuah's)
thoughts.
Debar vs. Logos
The Gospel of John was originally written in Hebrew then
Hellenized into a Greek appropriate book in order to
assimilate pagan religions through syncretism.
The Hebrew word used in John Chapter 1 was
debar.
A Hebrew and
Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament shows us that
the Hebrew word
dabar refers
to Yahuah's Plan and His Laws.
A Hebrew and
Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament, by
Julius Furst, page 312
dabar
The Interpreter's Dictionary
states emphatically that “word” or “logos” or “debar’ as
used in The Bible is referring to “Yahuah’s revealed will or
predestined Plan” for mankind.
Speaking of the debar i.e. “word”
of Yahuah, The Interpreter's Dictionary
states emphatically
The Interpreter's Dictionary
,
Volulme 4 pages 870-871
"The word
of God" (o logof tou qeou) is used of:
(a) the OT law (cf. Mark 7:13=Matt 15:6, where it is
contrasted with the tradition of the Jews);
(b) a particular OT passage (cf. John 10:35, referring to
Ps. 82:6);
(c) in a more general sense,
God's revealed will, or his whole plan and purpose for
mankind (cf. Luke 11:28; Rom. 9:6; Col.
1:25-27, where it is defined as the "mystery hidden for ages
and generations but now manifest to his saints..., which is
Christ in you"; Heb. 4:12);
The real meaning of John Chapter 1
What we have learned above is that our English Bibles are
modern Hellenized uninspired translations that
Hellenized the original Hebraic mindset of the New Testament
and promoted pagan philosophical thought.
The way John Chapter 1 is translated into English
embodies the pagan philosophical ideas from Babylon contained in the
Greek word “Logos”.
The real meaning of “word”
in John Chapter 1 can be found in the Hebrew word “debar”
which means the
predestined Plan of Yahuah.
What John had in mind was not
the pre-existence of Yahusha, but the pre-conceived Plan of
Yahuah. This is the polar opposite of how John 1 is taught
today.
With all this in mind, let us read the
correct translation of the following Scripture.
John 1
1 In the beginning
was the plan of
Yahuah, and the
plan was with Yahuah (and
defined His purpose in creation), and
the plan was
Yahuah's. 2 The same plan was in the beginning with
Yahuah. 3 All things were done according to the
plan of Yahuah,
and without the plan
of Yahuah nothing was done, that was done. 4 In this
plan was (predestined)
life (through a human Messiah’s
sacrifice), and that life was the light (revelation)
to mankind. 5 Now that light (revealed
plan to send a human Messiah has been fulfilled in Yahusha)
shines in the darkness, but the darkness does not take hold
of it. 6 There
was a man sent from Yahuah whose name was John.
7 He came as a witness
to testify concerning that light (that
Yahusha was The Passover Lamb of Yahuah), so that
through him all might believe (that
Yahusha was the fulfillment of that plan to send a human
Messiah). 8
He himself was not the light (the
Messiah, many believed John the Baptist was the Messiah);
he came only as a witness to the light (Yahusha).
9
The true light (Yahusha)
that gives light (reveals The WAY)
to everyone was coming into the world (as
a man). 10
He (Yahusha) was in
the world (in the flesh),
and though the world was reconciled to Yahuah through him,
the world did not recognize him.
11 Yahusha came to
that which was his own (the Jews),
but his own did not receive him.
12 Yet to all who did
receive him (enter into
The Yahushaic
Covenant), to those who believed in (the
covenant that bears) his name (The
Yahushaic Covenant), he gave the right to
become children of God—
13 children born not of natural descent, nor of
human decision or a husband’s will, but begotten of Yahuah (through
resurrection).
14
The predestined plan of Yahuah (to
send a human Messiah) became flesh (was
born human and fulfilled in Yahusha) and made his
dwelling among us (was fully human
in every way Hebrews 2:17). We have seen
Yahuah’s glory (fulfilled in
Yahusha), the glory of the one and only (begotten)
Son (until the first resurrection),
who came from the (predestined
mind or plan of the) Father, full of grace (covered
the death decrees for our sin) and truth (properly
teach The Torah as Moses prophesied of him).
15
(John the Baptist testified concerning him. He cried
out, saying, “This is the one I spoke about when I said, ‘He
who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me
(in the Plan of Yahuah and given
pre-eminence among the sons of Yahuah
Colossians 1:17)’”)
16 Out of his
fullness (of obedience to The Law)
we have all received grace (his
blood covers the death decrees in the Law) in place
of grace already given.
17 For The Law (with
active decrees
or
The Law of Sin and
Death) was given through Moses; grace
(the
decrees covered by the blood of the lamb) and
truth (The Law of the Spirit that
leads to life) came through Yahusha the Messiah.
18
No one has ever seen God
(including Yahusha) but (however)
the one and only Son (has come as
the light to reveal Yahuah to mankind), who is
himself the (the perfect human)
image of Yahuah (Colossians
1:15
–
“He is the image
of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation”)
and is in closest relationship (covenant
of marriage, the two shall become one) with the
Father, has made Yahuah’s plan (to
procreate a family) known to us.
That is the meaning and intent in
context of scripture and the Hebraic mindset of John Chapter
1. Yahusha was
not the incarnation of Yahuah in the flesh nor did Yahusha
have any hand in creation.
Yahusha is the fulfillment of the Plan of Yahuah to
send a human Messiah.
Yahusha was the perfect human image of the invisible
God. Yahusha is the Proxy of Yahuah.
Yahusha is the son of the Father and it is no more
complicated than that.
John 14
8 Philip said, “King, show us the
Father and that will be enough for us.”
9 Yahusha answered: “Don’t you know me, Philip, even
after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has
seen me has seen the (perfect
human image of the invisible) Father.
Colossians 1:15
“He
is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all
creation
How can you say, ‘Show us the
Father’? 10 Don’t you believe that I am in (covenant
with) the Father, and that the Father is in (covenant
with) me? The words (of
this covenant) I say to you I do not speak on my own
authority (I am the proxy or
messenger of Yahuah of
The Yahushaic
Covenant, the SIGNATORY). Rather, it
is the Father, living in me (through
His Spirit), who is doing his work. 11 Believe me
when I say that I am in (covenant
with) the Father and the Father is in (covenant
with) me.
Yahusha and Yahuah are “one” through
covenant. All
covenants in the Bible are marriage covenants.
Within the context of
The Yahushaic
Covenant, Yahusha and Yahuah are one family (one
through marriage) that is what the physical to spiritual
parallel of human marriage was designed to teach us.
John 10
25
Yahusha answered them, “I
told you (I was the Messiah),
and you do not believe. The works that I do in My Father’s
name, they bear witness of Me.
26
But you do not believe, because you are
not of My sheep, as I said to you.
27
My sheep hear My voice, and I know them,
and they follow my example.
28
And I give them (The
Way
to)
eternal life (by example),
and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch
them out of My hand.
29
My Father, who has given them to
Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch
them out of My Father’s hand.
30
I and My Father are one (family
in mind, will, purpose, and Spirit
through covenant of Marriage…
the two shall become
one).”
Yahusha came to
fulfill the marriage vows (The Law) which were always the
foundation of every marriage covenant:
Jeremiah 3
14
“Return, O backsliding children,” says Yahuah “for I
am married to you.”
Yahusha’s beginning
Yahusha’s existence
began like the existence of all the sons of Yahuah at the
point of his human birth to two earthly parents.
Yahusha did not “pre-exist” other than in the mind of
Yahuah within the context of the Plan of Yahuah.
King David
spoke prophetically as though Yahusha was doing the talking
in:
Psalm 22:9-10
9
But you took Me from My mother's womb, Yahuah! You made
Me trust in You, even from My mother's breast.
10 I was
cast upon You from My birth; from My mother's womb, You
are My Strength.
The word for
word Hebrew translation of Psalm 22:9-10, from
The NIV Interlinear Hebrew-English Old Testament
shows the word from in these Scriptures:
The Dictionary of Old Testament
Words for English Readers, says that the Hebrew
letter, mem, which has been circled in the
previous copy, is prefixed to a substantive, which denotes
the preposition. However, it is The
Hebraic Tongue Restored, by Fabre d'Olivet, which
tells us what these prepositions mean when the Hebrew letter
mem is prefixed.
EXTRACTIVE OR PARTITIVE ARTICLE. __ The movement
which this article expresses, with nouns or actions that it
modifies, is that by which a noun or an action is taken for
the means, for the instrument, by which they are divided in
their essence, or drawn from the midst of several other
nouns or similar actions. I render it ordinarily by
from, out of, by; with,
by means of, among, between, etc.
The New World Dictionary of the
American Language, Second College Edition, gives a
complete definition of the word
from in
Hebrew
mem as beginning
at, starting with, out of.
The word translated from
in Psalm 22:10, means beginning at,
starting with.
Yahusha
is prophetically pictured through King David to say that
Yahuah was His strength from the beginning, starting with
the point Yahusha Messiah was conceived in His mother's
womb. Yahuah was Yahusha's strength.
This
can only mean one thing: that before Yahusha was in His
mother's womb, Yahuah was not His strength, because
Yahusha did not yet exist. He had no need of strength.
Yahuah was only Yahusha's strength, beginning at, starting
with, His mother's womb.
The belief that Yahusha had his
beginning in the womb as flesh is The Spirit of Yahuah.
The denial and belief in the incarnation and Trinity
is the Spirit of the False Messiah (Jesus Christ) as I
demonstrated in my book
The Kingdom of
Yahuah.
The Spirit of the False
Messiah
Anyone who elevates the image of a
man known by his monogram
 i.e.
Hesus Horus Krishna (Jesus H. Christ) in their hearts as God
above Yahuah will be given over by Yahuah to believe a
lie. That
very lie is that The Law has been abolished by the
incarnation of God in the image
of
Jesus H. Christ.
The Spirit of the False Messiah is
anyone who denies that Yahusha was a mere man (came in the
flesh):
1 John 4
1
Beloved, do not believe every
spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from
Yahuah, because many false prophets have gone out into the
world (claiming to be the
incarnation of God).
2 By this you know
the Spirit of Yahuah: every spirit that confesses that
Messiah Yahusha has come in the flesh (a
man) is from Yahuah;
3 and every spirit
that does not confess Yahusha has come in the flesh (but
says Yahusha is Yahuah or The Trinity) is not from
Yahuah; this is
the spirit of the antichrist (or
False Messiah.
The False Messiah is an image of a man worshipped above
Yahuah as God) …
12 No one has seen Yahuah at any time! (Because
Yahusha is not Yahuah in the flesh or a demi-god).
Anyone who elevates the
false
image of Yahusha (known as Jesus) into a God in their heart
believing in the incarnation has
The Spirit of The
False Messiah.
The Spirit of Error
The Spirit of
Error is given to all of those who commit this
abomination and elevate the image of Jesus in their hearts
as God. That
Spirit of Error
is defined as “abolishing
the law” i.e. do not keep the commandments of Yahuah.
2 John 7 - Beware of Antichrist Deceivers
7 For many deceivers have gone out
into the world who do not confess Yahusha the Messiah as
coming in the flesh (but
rather confess Jesus is God in the flesh).
This is a
deceiver and an antichrist.
(The Spirit of the False Messiah) 8 Look to
yourselves, that we do not lose those things we worked for,
but that we may receive a full reward. 9 Whoever
transgresses (The
Law of Yahuah) and does not abide in the
doctrine of the Messiah (that he
did not come to abolish The Law) does not have
(the Spirit of) Yahuah (they
have
The Spirit of Error).
He who abides in the doctrine of the Messiah (that
not one Jot or Tittle of The Law has been abolished)
has both the Father and the Son. 10 If anyone comes to you
and does not bring
this doctrine (but
brings a Trinitarian lie and teaches
unrighteousness as
truth see Romans 1:18 that The Law was abolished),
do not receive him into your house nor greet him; 11 for he
who greets him shares in his evil deeds (breaking
of The Law).
Next:
Divine
Emanation? Was Yahusha used in creation?
|
